Synopsis
"Falsely accused as the murderer of my own husband... Oh, the cruel machinations of fate!" A female teacher (Lee Yong-ae) gives shelter to an escaped convict, but her husband, misconstruing her intentions, reacts violently and accidentally stabs himself to death in the process. The teacher is charged with her husband's murder, but fortunately the prosecutor on the case is a former student of hers, of whom she had taken painstaking care when she was working at an elementary school. Remembering her kindness to him, the prosecutor uncovers her innocence in court, and she is acquitted of the crime.
Notes
"A silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha)
A Public Prosecutor and a Teacher is familiar to us for the performance of Shin Chool, Korea's last silent movie narrator (known as "byeonsa"in Korean). Numerous critics have recommended the film, praising it as "a silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha), "the work of Korea's last silent movie narrator" (Kim Hong-joon), a movie that "reflects the public's consciousness and has great historical value" (Lee Seung-hun), and "the archetypal new-school film" (Chung Sung-il). As evidenced by such commentary, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherenjoys greater recognition for its historical value as the only surviving silent movie in Korea than for its artistic or technical aspects. What is ironic is the fact that this recognition derivesfrom a production and screening method that fell behind the times, as sound films (or "talkies") had already become the norm when the movie was first made. Its inclusion in the list is therefore based on its historical, social context rather than on the film itself.
Afterword:
- Narrated by Shin Chool, who is known as Korea's last silent film narrator, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherhas been screened at several film festivals since the latter half of the 1990s.
就那么点内容凑够了一部电影，真是醉了，我看得好困啊。
不像是2022的电影像是2002年的，过于标准已经说过无数次的一个变异起源故事。
2.0。1.兄弟对立能理解，但是反派转变太快毫无征兆。2.特效、服化道、场面都乏善可陈。
注射吸血蝙蝠的血清以期变身蝙蝠侠，结果变成了吸血鬼，因为蝙蝠侠靠的是科技，跟蝙蝠没啥关联，莫比亚斯拒食人血，不甘心成了反派，于是来了个吸血鬼二号，恰好毒液2也走了这条道，以更恶掩盖恶的来源，光明不可能，暗黑又没到位。
进阶现代版夜访吸血鬼 分全给演员阵容 但观感上比毒液2和蜘蛛3好
如果是小成本b级片看着还可以，但是这居然是漫威漫画改编，感觉拍的很平庸敷衍，吸血鬼题材尺度也不大。画面也太暗了。看样子索尼拍不好漫威电影，片尾彩蛋的漫威宇宙联动倒是让人很感兴趣
2.5分作品。漫威又成就了一部低分亦劇情一條直線而又毫無懸念的商業大片。如果拿來對標《毒液2》的話，這部更加一落千丈！
PS：漫威版真·蝙蝠侠，比起DC那个只有rich的富家子，人家最起码还有超能力好吧。╮(╯▽╰)╭
导演好像只是想拍出来什么动作和特效，对含糊不清的剧情没有多少建树。场景的转换，情节的变化都自带加速，连演员走几步路都要通过剪辑。忽略演员本身演绎，漫威十年的成功难不是吸引了很多出名的演员加盟。但是就近两年几部新作看来，显然太让人失望！
作为一部惊悚片，不够惊悚；作为一部超级英雄片，格局太小。索尼不如换个思路，让男主的变身效果更漂亮一些，让他跟毒液搞基，可能还更有意思一些
6.5分。其实总体还可以，就是有点90年代B级片的感觉
为什么那么多人低分。我觉得还可以啊，虽然老套路，漫威不就是这样的吗？看多了见怪不怪。特效够炫，男主够帅够猛不就好了。爆米花电影要求多有逻辑故事多好很难
全片最佳是彩蛋…时隔5年又见到秃鹫了。正片里最震撼的场景，诺兰在17年前的《侠影之谜》已经展示过了。
索尼用行动表示有多么迫切撺一个邪恶六人组的局出来😅
唯一的亮点恐怕只有那句 I'm the venom 了
索尼的漫威宇宙除了小蜘蛛真的没法看。落后于时代的拍法。 当然因为没期待所以也不算失望 本来就是二线的角色 还拿出这样平平的作品 彩蛋还想和那个鸟人（抱歉 这个反派我也不认识）合作打蜘蛛么 还要拍？ 也许下一部更好吧。
平庸到极致也是一种烂。部分动作戏的设计也有精彩之处，但还是被烂俗且无逻辑的剧情掩盖。
作为索尼漫威宇宙的又一起源故事，Morbius几乎在所有的地方都平庸而过，能留下印象的也就只有Jared Leto和那可圈可点的视觉特效了。
到少爷一抬头可以直接加入现代版JCS的下眼线造型就可以结束了，剩下的我带入日语吹替版都没法吃完啊。最后彩蛋让我想球球sony和漫威放过彼此，你们真的不用这样先婚再强制爱的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
