剧情介绍

  这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
  An absurdist classic
  This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.

评论:

  • 斐俏丽 2小时前 :

    6分/看之前预期有点过高了,反而看的时候感觉没那么好。发生在一个地点的小规模战斗,没有大场面,看到后面有一点点乏味,好在片长没有硬撑到两个小时。频繁的慢镜头子弹时间、多次描写牺牲时相似的视听都加重了冗长的观感。

  • 卫珉成 0小时前 :

    有时我会觉得,那个时期才是中国最好的年代,

  • 务和怡 6小时前 :

    没有一处动容 以前是抗日神片 现在是抗美神片

  • 承怀柔 3小时前 :

    题材选的不错。但是细节太差了。逻辑硬伤实在受不了。

  • 季山菡 3小时前 :

    美军的演员台词都太差劲,对地形的交代太少,五班以及后期大永的跑位缺乏更高视角的展现

  • 帛湛芳 7小时前 :

    虽然很爱国 但是剧情强行推进 太不合理了,后段拍摄拉了,当然比水门桥还是强太多了

  • 易乐芸 1小时前 :

    非常喜欢——每个角色都非常真实,他们除了是战士,是志愿军,更是父亲,是丈夫,是兄弟,镜头给那些被标注以“英雄”的人,雕刻了最生动的注脚。最不知名的小战争下,有最闪光的人性。张艺谋,很棒,一如既往。

  • 寒水彤 4小时前 :

    情节设计太过牵强,我军明明知道亮亮是个重要的情报人员,仍然只派一个班的人来救,白白牺牲了五班好几个战士不说,还耽搁了那么多时间,而对比美军反应过来以后,直接派了一个连的重火力来抢人,双方重视程度的差异让人费解。

  • 敖乐安 0小时前 :

    前面相当于很长的铺垫,后半段有点死神幽灵的感觉了。子弹时间是滥用,缺少一点想象力,可能emo这几年拍的太快了

  • 尤冷松 6小时前 :

    张艺谋的水平还是够高,最近看的三部贺岁档电影里,只有这部有足够的电影感,人物塑造,故事处理,也都非常舒适。

  • 妍婧 4小时前 :

    我们无法将敌人塑造成可敬的人,但我们起码应该把他们塑造成人

  • 函琪 2小时前 :

    6.2/10 三一律+条件悬差的对阻戏,大俯拍+各景别镜头的代入感,这是优点。神化的子弹时间、煽情、工具化的配角以及结尾剧情的崩坏,这是缺点。这片子大的框架像是老谋子已经搭建好,女儿只管执行没有太多私人的毕业作。

  • 卫泓成 2小时前 :

    太烂了,尤其枪战场面,烂片,根本看不下去。

  • 刘昊苍 6小时前 :

    还要抓活的。

  • 拓跋谷秋 6小时前 :

    国师出手 还是有点分量的 没有大场面 但是拍的还是挺好的,不过铺垫不够 没有深度 后面明显就没劲了

  • 卫三泓 8小时前 :

    太烂了,尤其枪战场面,烂片,根本看不下去。

  • 宫家馨 7小时前 :

    不愧是老谋子!!!就是说枪战片都拍的和普通人的不一样

  • 刚舒云 0小时前 :

    没有大场面,或许这也是我们应该知道的,无数个他们这样的人赢来了我们的现在。

  • 卫子瑞 0小时前 :

    为什么片尾出字幕要仿拍上甘岭那段一条大河,却放那么个绵软的片尾曲呢?

  • 佼韶仪 8小时前 :

    惊讶于章宇从以前的“小弟弟”黄毛变成了现在的“大班长”刘文武,他真的好棒

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved