Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
两个人就这样被抛弃在格陵兰，拍的不够绝望和挣扎
刚把女神追到手转身去当和尚了，这我很不理解
其他都挺好，就是一件事，把人故意摔成这样不需要追究刑事责任吗？
马克沃尔伯格增肥出演。
北极之行，为了找寻证据，中规中矩，无大起大落
母亲问，你是要去拍色情片吗？遥遥回应《布吉男人》
在国内是放下屠刀立地成佛，在外国就要放下迪克侍奉噶德。
挺好的，起码很真实！！由于船长原因导致错失救援部分刻画的很好。
emo时刻可以选择小鸡电影来治愈，所以希望无论多“烂” 也有chick film的存在。
2022.5.*北极探险为了国家领土，困在北极，最终被救
只能强行理解了。
片子挺好的。马克的演技很棒。我打分7.6
非常流水账，基本都是有惊无险的操作，要不是一开始提示真实事件改编都以为是主角光环了，剧情拖沓，不吸引人。而且某种程度上说他们虽然看到的是残骸，但是他们也一直有弹药和食物。三角关系的部分何必呢，看完真心感叹可怜了那些狗
还一段，是stu说给父亲祈祷，父亲追出去骂他。
现在去看千禧年代的校园青春片，的确感受到陈旧落后了。有趣的是，醒来后以为是“传统”和“正确”间的碰撞，刚要喝彩，又落回了“现在”更好（最后毕业典礼的旗帜，集大成者了）。幸好，我们无法预知幸福的模样，但只要一直努力朝幸福走着，即使20年后发现目标错了，认完错我们仍旧能继续选择当下我们认为的“幸福”，保持在奔向幸福的过程中，这就够了。
前半段文武俱佳，为什么中后段突然的拖沓起来了？ Anyway看一个人的一生就是这样的，有高潮有低谷，到了结局的时候不免唏嘘。Mark W的演技出神入化，事实证明之前那些烂片真的不是马哥的锅。帅哥好基友也超可爱的
2星半吧。剧情一般般。没什么引人入胜的。雪景不错。明明有两个人可以一直聊天 陪伴。居然还会有幻想。
对《女孩梦三十》的拙劣模仿，笑点不高，致敬britney的那段不错。
人只有经过重大变故才会思考理所当然的人生，拍的中规中矩，出彩的地方不多。
马克终于不再拍一些无脑商业大片了，总是有个好的转型开始了，从他的剧中体型变化也能看出来，应该是下了不少功夫，希望越来也好，这个电影的原型斯图尔特．朗好强，真的男人，一生不屈服，进行抗争.......
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
