Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
情怀电影，节奏还是那个节奏，面具还是那个面具，凶手太平庸，没有第三部的女主角惊艳。警长还死了，cnm，编剧。
告诉你们：上来第一个妹子不是酱油炮灰，而是活到了最后。。。。
不是冲着铁三角，我一分都不想给
但是，凶手一般有俩人，其中一个肯定是男的。
韦斯母子被害后，姐姐开车去医院保护妹妹，区区一个小镇，愣是把车从白天开到了黑夜。
看到爆头那段又没忍住进来直接打二星了。先爆头再送人会死啊，菜鸡警察菜了五季了，死得其所!死得漂亮!
垃圾电影，
只是一个没有系列情怀的纯路人，看完整部电影是懵逼的。我能感觉出这一部想要从新角度推陈出新，但是却又掉入了另一个怪圈，就，毫无逻辑可言。
对于我来说，这是一部非常合格的续集，作为这系列电影的粉丝，我很满意，期待第六部
开头那个锁就很假。自动门电子门居然没有机械锁。电子锁被破解就凉了。这么多刀，开头的女的都不死，而且马上坐在病床上看起来生龙活虎的跟没事人一样。警察妈妈回去救儿子，结果枪也不拿直接冲回家真的不专业。女主就是要单独行动就是要搞你的智商。还是看完了，炒冷饭真的好没意思。情节各种不合逻辑。
从影片来讲，比德州电锯杀人狂好
你以为主角们避开了恐怖片的烂梗，但是他们还是在走恐怖片的烂梗。。。导演通过很多恐怖片的烂梗来掩饰此片的烂梗。。。
影片虽然想要突破，强行与初代做了联系同时请回了很多系列原角色以及原配乐，对系列进行了重构但依旧架不住整体的崩，结局也是毫无新意………
隔了十多年再看这个系列，依然没猜出来凶手是复数😅 基本上是一部影迷电影，各种horror movie都有被que到，显得略有点玩梗的感觉了哈哈哈特别是<如何在恐怖电影中生存指南>。京阿尼：我证明粉丝确实有毒
前30分钟还不错，满满的情怀致敬，但是中期节奏拖慢，最后为了强行反转情节生硬，几乎所有人都变成不死小强各种强行互殴变成一场尴尬的闹剧。我很喜欢原系列，包括后来的尖笑恶搞版，但这部重启还是没有达到预期的高度。
Dewey其实不该死。这个系列没有了Dewey，真的只有一半的灵魂了。
在镜头语言上稍微有一点点进步，其余部分，特别是文戏，简直是无聊透顶，而且有几个人是被活活蠢死的。
无脑智障导演拍出的、逻辑不通的、一点不恐怖的话痨片。
而且多次闪现的男友加出现面具人，早早就破解谜题了可以说，不过是强行加个女人双打。
其余配角存活三位，开局杀也变为可存活，大幅度更改前作设定是因为时代不允许照搬老套剧情，可这结局一堆人被嘎啦肠子腰子是不是更离奇了，从恐怖片直接跳跃成悬疑片，导演还是你会玩，至于评论里为新设定欢呼，夸血腥升级的同志们，我欢不起来，凶手“精心”设计就是为了能够多杀几个人来扬名，结果死亡人数也变成了待定，身上顶不了几个人头直接被边缘化，到底尖叫什么啊？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
