A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
动画片还是得看迪士尼，有情怀又有新意，一点也不怀疑是因为质量才被打入流媒体的。
Soho见鬼，冷血惊魂，镜像奇观，女性自救，但落于一个比较无聊的结局，复古感没有从头做到尾，CG某些地方还有点假。Thomasin McKenzie好多时候看着都特别像Abigail Breslin……
超现实的女性反抗题材，故事和镜头有点意思。但拍恐怖片，第一要务是吓人，不是讲道理。鬼没咋吓到我，光被这个女主角吓了。
艺术效果超预期但缺点也不少，前半青春校园剧反倒完成度更高，随后情感崩溃跨度大演技有一定难度，稍显吃力
版权第一人，只要政治正确，任性随便造，剧情什么的都无所谓了
枉费题材有创意，剧情却又来拉垮。
不愧是迪士尼，故事虽然不新了，可创意满满设计满满彩蛋满满，《就算画风不同我们也能一起玩耍》毫无意外地，我还是分不清奇奇和蒂蒂……但不影响他们可爱！
威尼斯非竞赛单元全球首映，《Baby Driver》导演埃德加·赖特的新片。题材有趣但不恐怖，结构问题略有瑕疵。主演之一的安雅·泰勒-乔伊昨天穿上死亡芭比粉礼服也太美了，不愧是新晋的世界顶流女星。我该补《后翼弃兵》了🎀
比预期中的好看，大量的彩蛋和玩梗，就是故事过于老套了，和对象看的挺开心。
6.8/10 好导演高标准，赖特太过于自我的男性视角构架出的女性困境故事只能用无趣甚至虚伪来形容。复古伦敦和Sandy好像彻底沦为赖特卖弄歌单的符号点缀，Eloise的角色更是鸡肋到只能用歇斯里底的表演去填补无逻辑的动机，另外靠牺牲基本的叙事推动去制造一个可笑的反转，这合适吗？
55/100，很意外赖特没有耍太多小聪明，反倒让本片显得更加无聊了，毕竟他原初的姿态就并非拍一部真正的“恐怖电影”，仅靠戏仿的原动力驱动着，笨拙地模仿着Giallo及更多恐怖类型的外在风格，缺少真正将“愚蠢”奉若信条的浪漫精神。至于深入地处理女性主义议题，则更是天方夜谭。该照镜子的到底是创作者自己，除了挑个好歌单倒是再干点儿正事吧。
EW 最严肃的一部？让人不敢轻易对任何时代浪漫化。哪里有水泥哪里就有腐败。模糊年代感的处理很棒，时效和音乐也是一如既往的好，两个女演员……真的要把我扳弯了。
2d，3d，真人混次元，还挺奇妙的。不过不知道是不是因为和学堂的孩子们一起看的缘故，他们老集中不了跑来跑去，我也没法专注剧情，也没太看过关联的作品，对很多角色有印象但不熟悉，就觉得有些索然无味了…
音速小丑那个真是绝了，设计成那样还好意思放到别的片子里吐槽，一点不觉着好笑。
无限破壁太爽了哈哈哈哈哈哈～蒂蒂的房间简直是我的快乐屋啊！！
实在是不喜欢看心理素质极差的，精分主角设定。满大街乱跑，得亏伦路窄，车速慢。但想想也是，不把女主搞这么讨厌，也显不出安雅女神演的反派这么飒。屋子里藏尸体这个设定太bug了，几十具，啥防腐技术啊。
看个乐吧，没啥特别好玩儿的，我要看蝙蝠侠对E.T.，就现在！
但画面2d+3d还是....太奇怪了，缝合怪感觉明显，虽然利于植入更多ip同频，但刺猬索尼克居然还有丑陋版本的...我不能接受
1：没有血与冰淇淋系列那种荒诞又好笑的感觉。2：前半段看着像是《布鲁克林》X《午夜巴黎》，小镇姑娘和60年代幻想。后半段特么直接低配版《闪灵》= =3：结尾过于迷惑，前半段花了这么多功夫营造60年代女性在不公环境中梦碎身陨，还等着看《可爱的骨头》呢，结果后半段直接反转，还不是末路狂花那种反转，只是一个疯子杀人狂老太婆= =。4：安雅泰勒乔伊美翻。
EW 最严肃的一部？让人不敢轻易对任何时代浪漫化。哪里有水泥哪里就有腐败。模糊年代感的处理很棒，时效和音乐也是一如既往的好，两个女演员……真的要把我扳弯了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
