剧情介绍

  喜剧,讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人,周旋于女友和未来岳父之间,因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人,认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
  Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
  Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
  The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
  Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
  Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
  Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
  In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
  On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

评论:

  • 佴雨莲 9小时前 :

    看安雅去的。前半部分尚可,万圣节之后开始崩坏。特别是鬼魂一边缠住女主一边喊help??有事吗??逻辑不通啊,你要人家help你你缠住人家??就很无语。反转也不算特别意外。最后也没看出来女主从哪里完成了自我成长,毕业设计又那么丑,就感觉结束的非常潦草。

  • 掌寄蓝 1小时前 :

    埃德加赖特不搞笑专心搞恐怖的时候,就会有点尴尬。二重身并不是什么新鲜的设定,硬要说的话就是可能就是镜内/境外的空间区隔和互动,包括那些男性幽灵出现时群魔乱舞的画面,也没有比《冷血惊魂》走廊里穿墙而出的手更令人意外。看到前一半的时候,会觉得这片子可能在讲男性凝视和中产/男权双重压迫,可能再加上一点欲望之中必然伴随恐惧之类的心理因素,再看下去,仿佛觉得女主不像是被压迫,倒像是真的自己精神出问题了,等到结尾出现,就完全不困惑了,因为不想知道这是个啥了。究竟是谁得救了?鬼知道。还有,谁给安雅设计的那条孕妇粉裙?真要命。

  • 后诗翠 4小时前 :

    3.5。故事老套,埃德加·赖特更像是在玩形式,红蓝对立,主面与镜面对立,角色“本我”和“超我”之间的互相撕扯。

  • 亓香卉 2小时前 :

  • 凤寻雪 8小时前 :

    后面女主的行为,真的好想翻白眼。但这个视听效果太棒了!

  • 巫马若山 8小时前 :

    本想借机好好怀旧一下在Fitzroy的日子,结果半路车翻得一塌糊涂,只觉得这种行人横在马路的频率,出租司机很可怜。

  • 文骞 2小时前 :

    故事比较普通。

  • 家初 8小时前 :

    赖特当然是个“迷影导演”——这里取的意思是:他没有立场,他只顾寻求反类型的概念与叙事快感,这场对60年代的大型凝视秀(不只是男性在凝视舞台上的女性,也有女性观众在向往舞台,然而赖特却并没有探讨此事的意图),因为最后的结尾而没有带来丝毫反思性的结果。最后呈现出的,是社会中的男性受害者遭受了女性过多的怨气,女性受害者变为加害者而不被社会所接纳——男权社会似乎并未受到批判,女性获救的方式是“走出”就好,可是哪有那么简单呢?影片开头埃丽的表演状态就是60年代的歌舞片(模仿赫本),随着唱片卡碟才正式进入故事,这就已经预示了对浮华时代的解构性:铅黄电影是对女性的剥削,那个时代的歌舞片又何尝不是呢?赖特恐怕也意识到了自己的虎头蛇尾和无法自圆其说,于是在最后让男性(跨性别者)穿上女主设计的服装,无甚收效。

  • 寒水彤 7小时前 :

    实在是不喜欢看心理素质极差的,精分主角设定。满大街乱跑,得亏伦路窄,车速慢。但想想也是,不把女主搞这么讨厌,也显不出安雅女神演的反派这么飒。屋子里藏尸体这个设定太bug了,几十具,啥防腐技术啊。

  • 尹建元 5小时前 :

    金曲点唱机+复古服装秀。看完又想去伦敦了。

  • 季山菡 7小时前 :

    赖特当然是个“迷影导演”——这里取的意思是:他没有立场,他只顾寻求反类型的概念与叙事快感,这场对60年代的大型凝视秀(不只是男性在凝视舞台上的女性,也有女性观众在向往舞台,然而赖特却并没有探讨此事的意图),因为最后的结尾而没有带来丝毫反思性的结果。最后呈现出的,是社会中的男性受害者遭受了女性过多的怨气,女性受害者变为加害者而不被社会所接纳——男权社会似乎并未受到批判,女性获救的方式是“走出”就好,可是哪有那么简单呢?影片开头埃丽的表演状态就是60年代的歌舞片(模仿赫本),随着唱片卡碟才正式进入故事,这就已经预示了对浮华时代的解构性:铅黄电影是对女性的剥削,那个时代的歌舞片又何尝不是呢?赖特恐怕也意识到了自己的虎头蛇尾和无法自圆其说,于是在最后让男性(跨性别者)穿上女主设计的服装,无甚收效。

  • 么寻雪 5小时前 :

    埃德加·赖特一贯的特色,各种类型和迷影的杂糅。杀人狂、精神病,最后竟然还有鬼屋,多种恐怖片元素集合。优质的镜头语言、音乐品味和女演员让影片有着本应有的“精彩”,只是女主角看到鬼魂就要四处奔跑,我都不知道她为什么要跑,也不明白她要跑到哪里去,而这样的情节竟然在后半段频繁出现,实在令人难以忍受。妓女如同演员,女明星梦碎伦敦,这样的升华,好像已经司空见惯平平无奇了。

  • 府慧月 3小时前 :

    梗超密集!2D+3D+真人的画面也非常奇妙

  • 乐正音景 9小时前 :

    只能说导演个人风格大过剧情本身,噱头铺满整场,结尾算是能自圆其说。更像一部时光交错,光怪陆离的魔幻伦敦60年代大型宣传片。Ps:安雅·泰勒是越来越火了,从早前一些看过电影里叫不出名字但令人印象深刻的角色,到现在各种女主女配,本片的造型特别像石头姐的风格,而且饰演女主坏室友的西诺薇·卡尔森好像寡姐和猩红女巫的混合版,哈哈。

  • 卫华哲 8小时前 :

    前后端撕裂严重,出色的表现主义影像和OST也改变不了剧情的单薄

  • 所德庸 9小时前 :

    对于迪士尼迷来说绝对热泪盈眶的回忆杀,虽然不属于我,但觉得挺可爱的

  • 戈梓楠 7小时前 :

    东拼西凑的复古怀旧元素、霓虹美学和镜头语言,镜像内外不同身份的调度,空间内旋转转场,这并不能称之为亮点的基础技法,是二三流导演用于提升影片质量的投机把戏而已。和《前程似锦的女孩》半斤八两,最后大招就这?最后想想,我是来看安雅的。

  • 平槐 0小时前 :

    复古,很美,恐怖悬疑做的不错,鬼影撞撞的都市,独自一个人身处陌生城市的孤独恐怖

  • 嘉勇 2小时前 :

    前半段基本就是文艺剧情片,大量冗长无用的对白只有豆瓣的文青能够看得乐不可支,作为一部英国电影这算是老传统了,紧凑是什么对于他们来说完全不重要,秀肌肉才是他们想要做的事情,但是对于一个爱看纯粹惊悚恐怖的观众来说真是受了大罪了,要忍受过前面大量穿插的废话以及桥段然后才会呈上大餐。看很多豆瓣文青对前半段大夸特夸,并大言不惭地表示“后半段垮掉了”真是好笑,你爱看文艺片就去挑几部文艺片看呗,这部电影走向还是惊悚为主,你说后半段垮掉了,那要不要给你们再跳一小时的舞唱两小时的歌才算不垮呢?豆瓣这种群体实在可笑,跑惊悚片来装文艺,去服装店买皮鞋,说多有病就有多有病。

  • 庆新冬 9小时前 :

    故事本身很平常,但是里面出现的很多动漫人物都能唤起人的回忆,比如说我就看到了希曼。另外蚁人的冷笑话”姨人”也真的很好笑。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved