Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
虽然pc得不能再pc了 但是欧美校园题材真的是怎么拍难看不到哪去
奇奇怪怪，不知道想表达什么。女主瘫在床上二十年还能长这么壮实属实离谱
这样摔下来没阴影吗 最后还肆无忌惮再跳一次 有两个不离不弃的朋友已是人生幸事
Alicia Silverstone是最大的惊喜
太好看了！终于有电影是重返青春但是不穿越的了！欧美青春片永远🉑️！！！
笑死了，prom dance的时候Stefanie跳lead，prom king一脸享受哈哈哈。总体上这部电影很欢乐呀，很久没这么欢乐的电影了，蛮搞笑的，会看第二遍
Crazy那一段出场才是爷青回的感受……感觉需要去把歌单更新一下……｜可能我也是一个活在37岁躯体里的高中生吧……
仿佛自己也回到了年轻的时候，啦啦队跳舞真的会让人热血沸腾啊！
一直很喜欢女主，看过一些作品，但是这部虽然说题材挺新…但是有点太肤浅了…成年人去解决高中生的问题，就没什么好看的…只能当喜剧看轻松一下吧
设定挺搞笑的，有点意思是家长还在为些小事想要鸡娃，新时代孩子早就不care了
看着又开始遗憾当时来学校的时候没能成功加入cheerleading society🙁
开头超酷艾薇儿！真的，2002我的生日又青回！
就喜欢看美国青春无脑电影 虽然后面的剧情突然就很怪 人物性格转变太快 但我还是很爱看
仿佛自己也回到了年轻的时候，啦啦队跳舞真的会让人热血沸腾啊！
一看就是conservative中年男人写出来的。纯属娱乐，不必当真
有着复古感觉的青少年电影，亮点并不多；唯一值得一提的便是Rebel Wilson，真的是瘦太多了。三星。
低于预期，这个题材好好写剧本的话怎么也是部合格的爆米花片，但这部不是。
看完总是觉得美国高中真好。。不愧是奈飞出品，非常工整，完整。。这个角度和想法，真的好。。最终为什么大家给不了高分呢。。是不喜欢好学生的中规中矩好作品嘛。。哈哈哈。。
我好喜欢啦啦操 我好喜欢少女 我好喜欢青春的味道。we are just we
一看简介就感觉是对标2000年的romcom，美国人真的永远忘不掉高中，逃不开prom。但执行的不错，有些点还是触动到了我。爸爸妈妈的肯定怎么就不算呢，明明这些人才是最重要的。2022届的这批毕业生也塑造的很可爱。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
