Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
只能说是别具一格的战争片，故事呈现的战争地点不是城市楼宇、小镇街巷，而是在山间田野。开头、结尾的镜头带着一点诗意，没有过分的主角光环和个人英雄主义等等，这些都是本片特色的地方。整体没有特别精彩，但有佳句，值得鼓励。
这样的美术了不起 个别几个镜头还不错 雾中的伏线 。如果有个好故事…
总体来说还可以，三星中规中矩，一星给柄本明的化妆。
另类的战争片讲述无名之辈的历史故事，诗意和悲怆感共存，忍不住叫绝。
想讲的太多，节奏太快，叙事太乱太流水账了，对不了解这段历史的人确实不太友好。池田屋和卡门意外的配。
先说优点，摄影讲究，音效丰富，打鱼小妹的吴侬软语好听，在杜比厅里看很沉浸。再说缺点，套一层黑白滤镜≠水墨化，吝啬台词≠诗意≠适合战争题材，相比起来还是《1917》看着舒服。综上，我愿称之为本届北影节最佳催眠影片。
弘扬浙西南革命精神的同时也展现了人性光辉，平凡的英雄亦有赤胆忠心，为了完成军令甘愿舍弃自己的生命，致敬！
还没有哪一部战争片让我有这么新奇的体验，诗意与现实并存，突出战争的残酷，让“浙西南革命精神”可以很好地走进观众内心。
革命精神传承媒介又有了新的突破，这部别样的战争片带给观众全新的体验，沉浸式观影过程中能更好地理解革命精神，理解有助于传承，相辅相成。
全片只使用了黑白红三种颜色，整体氛围感很特别，长镜头和音乐运用凸显了一种阴森恐怖感，给人一种深刻的压迫，这才是战争最真实的一面吧。
充满水墨质感的一部战争电影，独特的美学风格让人不自觉重新审视战争片这个类别，原来还可以有这样的呈现方式。
（冈田准一在关原演石田三成还行，到这里演土方岁三好像都是短板，前期光顾着看他怎么能这么土，后期光顾着看他身高实在不行。。。。）
看完沉默。怪司马辽太郎吗？怪原田真人吗？怪冈田准一吗？还是怪那个历史上的新选组呢？电影如同那段历史一般，终究是无可挽回。叙述视角拍得跟李秀成自供一般，虽然很像《关原之战》开头的叙述三成献茶故事，但还是太过平淡了，该如何拍这样漫长、或者辽阔（关原之战）的故事呢，原田真人尽力了，但答不好。公家在这电影里太黑了。
立意非常不错的影片，年轻一代更需要看看，感受挺进师精神的熏陶，面对挫折时将会更有勇气。
只有说着同样语言 来自相同家乡 却端起枪口瞄准对方的兄弟们
如果不提前告知，真看不出来这是小成本制作，画面美轮美奂相当有质感，人性的立意也很高深，说是大制作一点也不为过。
最大的问题是长镜头调度下的斯坦尼康摄影，太晃了完全不能入戏。塔可夫斯基之类的诗意电影都是用沉稳的轨道或者吊臂。还有这种假黑白影像更多的是消色，有点像银版画，数字感下的伪劣质感太难看了。故事就不说了，完全是一般般的实验影像，感觉都算不上电影，电影有看不清脸的吗，灯光的消失.
我流泪了，不是感动的，是实在太困哈欠连连。摄影精美，但画面太碎。剧本单薄，且配音垃圾。除了开头有蛇的部分是精华，后面都一直让人出戏。怎么会有后期配音毫无空间感和距离感的，每一声都炸在你的耳边且好几段连嘴型都对不上，不知道谁在说话，方言也很鸡肋。据说是美院第一部龙标，希望努力，让专业的人做专业的事，提升标准和品味。
革命精神传承媒介又有了新的突破，这部别样的战争片带给观众全新的体验，沉浸式观影过程中能更好地理解革命精神，理解有助于传承，相辅相成。
就算作为流水账都太难看了。两个半小时拍新选组的历史，怎么可能拍得清楚。04年大河剧版帮追完一年的观众回顾剧情的总集篇都比这个长。只拍池田屋或者箱馆战争不好吗。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
