Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
之前记得有8分？没啥看头，童话不童话，没感动，鸡汤也不好喝。好久没吃生蚝了，边吃生蚝边看还是挺开心的，毕竟生蚝好吃。
。。。小学老师是这样的？小学生都会勾心斗角啦？ 真的只能用这样的剧情来启发孩子和家长？
真挺好看的哈哈哈哈哈。唯独觉得哈，这是写给我们90后80后的故事，跟现在的教育体制不太一样了。
童话书是我很小的时候看的了，也记不得内容了…但据说本片改动还不小…其实这要是拍的能有吹梦巨人或胡桃夹子那样，我也就给四星了…但奈何你非拍成了时间的皱折和阿特米斯…前半段其实都挺好，后半段崩的有点厉害…
小孩子应该会喜欢这部电影，我旁边小男孩看哭了，都直揉眼睛。感觉大人和年轻的朋友也能看下去，时间不长，剧情也很简单。结局有些强行正能量和合家欢，但大概是目前只能这样拍吧。
为了情怀而看，结局被鲁西西感动到。想起自己的金色童年，要好的小伙伴们哪有唯成绩论，明明是唯身高论嘛。不过当年看书时幻想的罐头小人都是神奇又drama大人模样，有点不太一样。
作为儿童电影，表现已经很不错了。
作为一个看郑渊洁童话长大的已经失去童年的成年人来说，除了个别台词能感觉到戳中现实以外，整体感觉并不好，说教，脸谱化。除了打小报告那个100分，其余都是善良的孩子。而成年人，无一例外的都是不讲道理的。从家长到老师、校长，全都让人不舒服。妈妈竟然说出成绩好就不喜欢孩子的话。这个世界并不是非黑即白啊。
93.电影院的小朋友太激动了，连叫好的都有，情怀值四星，特效有点五毛钱，豆瓣7.1，可见一斑。
师者作业考试叫家长，父母言传身教与人言。
5。这年头还有这么古早，直白，简单，低幼的说教，实在是对不起郑渊洁老师的原著。
小学可以开除学生吗，小学还有什么保送重点中学？九年制义务教育不都是按学区来的吗？小孩让五个小人先回家，他们怎么回去？回去得多久？能活着到家吗？为了推进剧情最后还来个学校火灾也太狗血了吧。不过我那个上三年级的儿子很喜欢看。
好的作品，不仅儿童受教育，大人也能受教育。这是个嘛？
去万达看的提前点映，主创也都来了。如果是小时候看的话，应该会挺喜欢，但对于现在小朋友来说，可能不太有新意了，毕竟时代发生了很多的变化。
尊重原著作者的同时，也请尊重一下大银幕的，这是电影，又不是奥特曼连环剧，制作成这样最好走网大好些
本来是不是即使没有个郑渊洁宇宙，也得有个魔方大厦？
之前记得有8分？没啥看头，童话不童话，没感动，鸡汤也不好喝。好久没吃生蚝了，边吃生蚝边看还是挺开心的，毕竟生蚝好吃。
有时候看的很入神的时候，突然来个好笑的，就感觉特别的特别的好笑。 约翰那个胖子样子很好笑。
片子传递的信息挺对的，最后电影院前排一个孩子看得哭得稀里哗啦的。没怎么看过儿童片，四星吧
拍的很程式化，该怎么样的地方就怎么样，适合三到六年级小朋友观看。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
