A quick glimpse at the cast for this film would make any horror fan giddy with glee. The actual movie doesn't live up to those high expectations, but it's far from being all bad. Desi Arnaz Jr. (!) plays an author who makes a crazy $20,000 bet with his publisher that he could write a great novel in only 24 hours. To do so, the publisher gives him the keys to an old abandoned house where he won't be disturbed. Not true. Once he gets there he is interrupted by a multitude of guests including a family which consists of John Carradine, Sheila Keith, Peter Cushing and Vincent Price. They are gathered there in a twisted family reunion to release their brother from the room he's been imprisoned in for forty years. Even Christopher Lee drops by as Corrigan, the man who has just purchased the house. Soon, they realize that the caged brother is loose and out for revenge.
What a great plotline and what a dream cast! This movie should have been a hell of a lot better. It's hard to pinpoint the exact problems with the film, but I would venture to say that the lack of lighting was a major fault. Sure the house has no electricity but I think they took the title of the movie a little too literally. Scenes after scenes are barely visible and the actors' faces are undecipherable. Only the moments in the main dinning hall are well lit. Also, the great actors are given very little to do. Cushing gets a few chuckles as the scared brother but Price, Lee and especially Carradine are somewhat wasted here. Well, at least Price gets the best line of the film: `Please don't interrupt me while I am soliloquizing.' And on the plus side, the story has enough twists and turns throughout to keep one`s interest and the ending, while a bit of a cop-out, manages to surprise.
2022.3.28
男主潜意识里的认知 一切只是在阶层挑战里的游戏
电影拍得像广告，能不能不要再搞这种系列电影了...（看完只记得个鸭先知）
每个人都可以变成光，但独自一人是无法闪耀的。
最好的是徐峥，无论是演技，故事架构，还是喜剧效果，扣题，都非常精准。
总得来说，徐峥＞章子怡＞沈腾＞吴京
的确比TV版强一些，早能料到剑悟醒来第一句会说斯麦路斯麦路
tv当时大家狂喷是吃了泽塔太好的亏
完整配置的实验对话电影。避免了背后权利的揭示，通过台词仍然可以看见。
故事讲的非常流畅，花了很多笔墨在塑造两个青少年角色，事件的受害者和被告，他们各自的原生家庭，解释着二人的“迷之行为”。很喜欢这种讲法，对于看多了韩剧国剧的狗血节奏的观众，会觉得和情节无关。因为他们的父母，才有两个这样的年轻人。影片的另一亮点是法庭戏的部分，女性和男性对于性事的感受上和认知上的错位，造成了这个案件，而法庭只讨论同意权。男人可能永远也不理解，就是那几十秒钟的快感的事情，怎么女性会想到了那么多，你让我感受到了委屈，就是一种不自愿。话说一大票法国一线明星为这个戏当配角，可以一看的。
同时，导演也交代了目前法国的法律和司法制度的环境背景之当代完美现状：陪审团制、无罪推断原则、法律的矫正功能和教育意义以及社会意义、司法独立不受舆论操弄、淡化法律的惩罚意义、关注两位当事人的心理修复和社会修复等。 而，既然是思想实验，剩下的，就交给诸位讨论了。
1.徐峥2.沈腾3.章子怡4.吴京 原谅我更喜欢喜剧一点的
律师有句话太戳我了，“我唯一的目标，是让你们相信他在法律面前是无辜的，不是道德”。
FG好片法律的公正。双方辩护律师精彩的辩护。要但是公平正义不是无辜。
最喜欢徐峥的故事，章子怡的题材不错，其他两个一般吧，沈腾的有点尬
和最后的决斗叙事方式类似，但这部只是通过男女两人不同的视角展开这个案件，我们可以深切感受到双方的想法，就像结尾律师的结案陈词说的一样，两位都说的很好，但比较而言我更加赞成男方律师，虽然我是个女性，但想了下结尾和女方陈词，“只有说 不 才代表不同意吗？沉默就代表同意吗”好像也很站女方……这本身就很难定义，并不觉得像其他影评说的摇摆不定（胆怯）
"沉默代表同意吗?不是的,沉默代表痛苦"
"对于性侵,讲述意味着重温"
章子怡的最好，诗意有张艺谋那味了，内容丰满。徐峥的其次，也算优秀，少年行太空洞，吴京的太假，骑兵冲锋让我想起了鸦片战争，别这样了。
3.0/10。已经没救了，又可以弃坑一次啦。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
