真假 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 喜剧片 中国 2016

导演: 高露   

剧情介绍

  喜剧,讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人,周旋于女友和未来岳父之间,因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人,认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
  Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
  Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
  The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
  Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
  Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
  Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
  In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
  On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

评论:

  • 祁雁 8小时前 :

    2022-03-27 垂直镜头里,两人躺在水床上,身下仿佛是荧幕透出的光。

  • 淦海之 4小时前 :

    ps,男女主真的看不太出来年纪差了十好几岁

  • 鹏凡 9小时前 :

    三星半。致敬《雨中曲》部分拍得很美,但个人觉得大部分的笑点都有些弱智,看多了略尴尬和无语。。其次,剧本做得粗糙,有好几次转折都太生硬了,人物关系基本没建立起来。不否认服化道做得很有风格,但这似乎只是对原版的继承?

  • 詹鸿运 1小时前 :

    上半部分笑是真好笑,俗是真好俗。

  • 班睿博 8小时前 :

    我不理解,每个人物我都不理解,每个情节我都不理解,每句台词我也都不理解,我不理解不是因为我看不懂,只是因为我实在是没办法跟一个未成年男人意淫出来的世界共情。这就是中年白男的真实趣味吗?哈哈

  • 母若山 0小时前 :

    其实挺不错的,光看标题和简介有点容易错过的电影。一看男主就觉得很像霍夫曼,点进去果然是霍夫曼的儿子。

  • 邦安 9小时前 :

    期待四年多,安德森竟为我们奉上一个轻松愉快青春爱情故事!实质也是一部非常规的群像电影,在男女主角的爱情故事里穿插各种具有时代特征的人物(电影明星、制片人、议员等等),用梦幻的笔触描绘70年代洛杉矶城镇生活的点滴回忆。类似的题材,导演早在《不羁夜》里出色地示范过了,而且那部结构和人物关系更复杂迷人。安德森太久没拍群像题材,生疏退步与否见仁见智,不过70年代美国中产的生活离我们当下太过遥远,难以有强烈的共鸣却是很明显的。当然,摄影、美术和音乐品味依然魅力十足,这和安德森长期拍摄音乐MV的老本行是分不开的。

  • 茹呈 7小时前 :

    戏中戏的设定百看不厌啊,搞笑也是真的搞笑,好看的~

  • 祁联锋 9小时前 :

    WTF?!今年Best Picture提名里最离谱的,说是白男视角的青春爱情小品都抬举它了,看到3/4的时候我已经生理性不适想要呕吐。难以想象这是拍《魅影缝匠》的PTA。

  • 锦琪 4小时前 :

    PTA也拍了属于自己的往事片,关于Valley的展现很私人化,而且对于时代风貌的展现也很具体,镜头里的洛杉矶很真实。对于本片ZZZQ的批评有些无厘头,明显这里展现的就是当年的现实,而且也在女主那呈现了正确的审视角度。

  • 贝合乐 5小时前 :

    选角、剧作和表达都是PTA的故乡情怀和私人情感,非常作者情绪的叙事并不屑观众的共情。但在美妙的镜头语言下,在70年代洛杉矶的每一次奔跑都有着澎湃的感染力。

  • 申屠芮美 1小时前 :

    3.5;宛如青春版的《私恋失调》,同样是游弋迷茫中的寻找,同样是“古怪”投射于对方心田呈现的成长史,但处理得更闲散——最后当你几乎确信一切都不会再有故事发生时,情感的激流才汇聚到彼此终于站到同一起跑线的位置;在情感的平衡中永远此消彼长,永远无法用得到或失去去精确计量,正如他们善用冷言伤害对方,心理防御的机制甚至一度让他们错失,这种曲折是必然的,拉锯是说服自己和对方的过程。

  • 潮痴柏 2小时前 :

    15岁的他能让25岁的她心动的原因在于,他有着30岁的成熟度。甘草和披萨看似很违和的东西最终也能因为各种奇奇怪怪的原因搭配到一起,世界就是这么奇妙。没想到《life on mars》 出现在一个阳光灿烂而无足轻重的场景。 PTA依然细腻真实,两个人的情感流通表现得不够深入。选角没有亮点,音乐也没用到位。

  • 朋季同 0小时前 :

    我们有所保留,我们付出一切;我们心猿意马,我们两情相悦;我们彼此折磨,我们拯救对方;我们针锋相对,我们同仇敌忾。我有好多好多理由不喜欢你,我喜欢你。

  • 翰强 9小时前 :

    致幻的情节与运镜真是PTA专属,让人舒适的观影,70年代是对现在的隐喻,创业、政治、迷幻药与广告形成了每个人生存意义的注脚,但形形色色的口号背后只剩荒诞,PTA最后落到了真情还是挺温暖的。

  • 程力夫 7小时前 :

    一见钟情?命运捉弄?双向奔赴?一生一世?We don't do boyfriend and girlfriend, and I don't know what we are.

  • 茜桃 6小时前 :

    很久没看过这么奇诡乖谬的爱情片啦,背景还是喜欢的年代喜欢的地方,连他们的穿着打扮也是我现在心里时尚前沿的。喜欢Alana无数次随时随地就奔跑起来的样子,25岁当然也可以像小孩一样拥有powerful feeling~

  • 香雨 3小时前 :

    PTA这部属于是那种看着也能看,也不会煎熬,然而看了一遍也就看了,记着一些画面,记着这个简单的故事,只是心里和情绪上都没留下什么的一部电影。这些年(始于Phantom Thread)的PTA不知道是咋了……

  • 钰曦 9小时前 :

    有点儿意思,但意思不大,失望更多。关于一个对生活有野心有热情的姑娘,折腾的疲惫很真实也转瞬即逝,出了小酒馆聚众即兴演起电影很飞,但只是起了个调,完了就…没了?有种微妙的将人物们用完即弃的感觉…

  • 泥安吉 6小时前 :

    我就说这个创意很棒,原来是抄日本的。再仔细打磨一下可以成为不错的佳作,可惜太粗糙了。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved